Saturday, November 10, 2007

My Own Take on Ethos

I was inspired by my buddy Mike’s posts on Ethos at Bish Blog. Mike and I are a part of the same faith community. But when you read my take on Ethos then read Mike’s, you’ll see we are looking at the same coin. He sees heads and I see tails.

In my mind Ethos is to be cultivated as well as experienced. Case in point: When immigrants of my grandparent’s generation came to this country they came to become Americans. They believed in the American dream that if you work hard and smart, are honest, and a little bit lucky, one can provide a nice life for yourself and your family. They came, they learned the language, and they adopted large parts of the culture. At the same time they didn’t completely abandon their own culture. Thank God too. Where would we be without Italian restaurants and Chinese food? What they didn’t do is come here to impose their culture on the rest of America.

Ethos is a funny thing. It is literally the sum of the cultural parts as expressed in a particular community. As different people come and go the Ethos literally changes with each addition and each subtraction. But is there a part of the Ethos that is not negotiable? Another way to look at it is what makes this faith community (or church family) different form every other one. Is there something here in the culture of this faith community that makes some people want to stay and adopt it while others don’t want to adopt it and leave?

I submit to you that there are parts of the culture that if removed simply wouldn’t be the same culture. It’s those parts that we agree on that are the glue. I think they need to be explored, discussed, presented to people investigating us and taught to each other and our children.

So what's the glue?

First I would say we are all Christians in the traditional sense of the word. There are many different denominational backgrounds and beliefs represented. But we would all agree on the basic tenants of the faith like Jesus’ divinity, sacrifice on the cross to pay for the sins of us all etcetera.

This could be said about many churches and faith communities. But when Tara and I walk into a new home church we can usually tell within five minutes if they are kindred spirits or if they are just traditional church that hasn’t grown enough to meet in a building so they use a home instead. We like to visit other home churches to encourage them since when we started out 8 years ago we felt so alone. Similarly when someone visits our faith community they should be able to tell within a few minutes that something’s different here. It’s those differences that I think set us apart and join us together.

Answers to “Who’s your pastor?” and “How do you handle money?” tell Tara and I nearly everything we need to know to understand if they share the core components of our ethos or not.

If you were to ask ten different people in our church family who is the pastor you would get ten different answers. And none of them would be easy. No one would say seriously that it was pastor so and so. You might get answers like we all pastor each other. Or there is no specific person that is the pastor. Or different people have the gift of pasturing.

The next question is about money. To be frank, to prove tithing is legitimate from the new testament you have to do some serious biblical acrobatics. There’s more flips and twists in that argument than on an Olympic gym floor. So if we get an answer like “We teach that one should not rob God of his tithe which is 10% of gross income.” I know I’m just not in the right place. In our community we don’t teach or practice tithing to the community. Some in the group may tithe to other nonprofit organizations like Compassion international. But that is up to the individual family. I personally believe God wants 100% not a measly 10. But that’s another blog.

I should say something about transition here. Often times we hear an answer we like to one question but not both. Or we’ve seen where the answers they give show we are on the same page but their actions tell a different story. In those cases we say they are in transition. Most of us came out of a traditional 501c3 church where there is a board of directors, and executive director (the pastor) perhaps a staff (the clergy) and everyone else (laity.) When someone feels that there is something wrong with this sometimes they leave and do something new. Sometimes they work their way towards what many people know as a home church. During the time when they are unlearning everything they were taught and relearning what is true according to the Bible, we call this time transition. This process takes time, often several years. During which what people believe and how they practice that belief goes through many changes. But that’s another blog.

A related element of our Ethos is the willingness to unlearn, relearn and challenge long held beliefs. When Tara and I first left our AG church we spent the next 6 years just trying to figure out what the Bible actually said instead of what people told us it said. Believe it or not it doesn’t take a degree in theology to understand its core messages and meanings. Yes there is value to an education. Don’t get me wrong. But in an effort to differentiate themselves and justify their occupations too many theologians have complicated the good news beyond repair. Some over complicate the simple. There are lots of reasons this is the natural tendency but that’s another blog.

Finally the priest hood of the believer is held to be true and practiced. Most churches will say they believe in the priesthood of the believer but when it comes to praying for people, teaching, preaching, etc. it’s usually up to paid clergy to do that work. Everyone else is relegated to child care and parking ministry. In my own experience I made it all the way up to head usher. I was shooting for senior head usher but didn’t make it before I left. In the group I worship with now, everyone is encouraged to use their gifts no matter who they are or what their education. All that is needed is maturity, gifting, opportunity, and God’s timing all within the context of respect for the boundaries of the nuclear family. Maturity is the state of knowing what to do or say, gifting is the God given power to do or say it, opportunity is having the chance to do it, and finally God’s timing is that internal sense that God wants it done or said now or later. The context of nuclear family means if a man is going to room to privately pray for another man’s wife, he had better ask the man’s permission first and all the other situations like that where God has put man to protect his wife and parents to protect their children.

Peace,
-John

Labels: , , ,

Dallas Willard once asked

This is another letter to our home church community. We have the situation right now that we've grown in numbers to about 50 people. We can't really house more people since we meet in a home on Sunday. So several of us are asking ourselves and eachother what do we do next. I know there is atleast one person that is thinking about leaving the core group and startng another one with one or more families. I don't personally think that's the best idea for that family or the group at large but I don't know anything better either. I do think that as we mature God will reveal his plan to us.

If you are interested in more information about how we do church, drop me a line. john@historicfuture.com.
Royal Palm Beach, FL 33411


Dear Church Family,


When I think about our community I am awestruck (like that other definition of fear of God.) I am excited for the future, thrill with the present and happy about our past. A question rolling around in many of our heads these days is what we do if 4 more families join us. I believe that as our maturity as individual believers and as a community increases, God’s choice for handling numeric growth will become self evident. Growth in maturity allows for successful growth in numbers (sometimes.)

"When do you suppose was the last time any group of believers or church of any kind or level had a meeting of its officials in which the topic for discussion and action was how they were going to teach their people actually to do the specific things Jesus said?" Dallas Willard

Yep I ripped this right off of Bish Blog.

The question is a bit skewed since in our community the “officials” and “their people” are the same all brothers and sisters in Christ. But it is a good question to ask ourselves. How do we teach ourselves to actually do what Jesus told us to do and what he modeled? In so doing, we answer both the questions about numeric and spiritual growth.

Peace,

-John

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, November 06, 2007

Whose Church Do You Go To?


This is a letter I recently wrote to our home church. We use yahoo groups to communicate with each other. I got it into my head to start proactively teaching things about how a home church should in my mind operate. We do operate this way. But there are many new people that understand it with there brains but don’t yet feel it with their hearts and the don’t act like it’s true. And there are many people who have been around for a while that need to be reminded lest they fall into old habits.

If you are interested in how our home church works beyond this article feel free to drop me a line john@historicfuture.com


Dear Chuch Family,

Have you ever been asked who the pastor of your church is? What they are really asking isn’t “who takes responsibility to disciple you and make sure you grow spiritually?” Instead what they are really asking is “who is the person that is the figurehead visibly in charge person?” If someone asked you who is the leader or in leadership at our gathering who’s picture immediately comes to mind? I know intellectually we know and believe no one person is in charge. In fact we strive to give God His proper place as in charge through the Holy Spirit. But I bet if we took a survey and asked the question of everyone in the group whose picture immediately comes to mind when asked the question who’s in charge on Sunday someone other than Jesus would come to mind. Several people are easy to identify with leadership for various reasons. Mike Bourque because it’s at his house that we worship, Mike Bishop because whatischurch.com has been the catalyst for so many of us gathering together or perhaps Brant because he invited so many people. A picture of a person other than Jesus is perfectly normal because that is how we are trained to think.

Let’s look at scripture.

1 Samuel 8
4 Then all the elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel at Ramah, 5 and said to him, “Look, you are old, and your sons do not walk in your ways. Now make us a king to judge us like all the nations.” 6 But the thing displeased Samuel when they said, “Give us a king to judge us.” So Samuel prayed to the LORD. 7 And the LORD said to Samuel, “Heed the voice of the people in all that they say to you; for they have not rejected you, but they have rejected Me, that I should not reign over them.
Emphasis added

We can see how Israel like us wanted a King like all the nations. That’s what they saw all around them. And the natural tendency is for us to follow the crowd. But in the end it’s clear that doing so was a rejection of God. (Saul by the way wasn’t all that great a King.)

So how do we actually”give God His proper place as in charge through the Holy Spirit? “ This goes back to the picture in our heads of who we think is in charge or the more deceptive version of the question who is in leadership (which is the same question in sheep’s clothing.) The fact that someone other than Jesus is the person’s picture that we see is proof positive of what our unconscious believes about the situation. That unconscious belief directly impacts how we act. Why for example don’t we think about ourselves in that light? If God is in charge by way of the Holy Spirit in us is not the Holy Spirit in each of us? Then aren’t each of us “in charge” as much as the next?

What does “in charge” mean in the context of home church? I like to use the term church family. I think it better represents what we do. I submit that “in charge” means something very different than the hierarchical concept of chain of command that we are used to. Church family life leadership is flattened. The parents are God. Each person is individually a child of God. With the wives being subject to their husband (no pun intended) and the children subject to their parents. The remaining differentiators are maturity, gifting, opportunity, and God’s timing. Maturity is the state of knowing what to do or say, gifting is the God given power to do or say it, opportunity is having the chance to do it, and finally God’s timing is that internal sense that God wants it done or said now or later.

In charge loses its meaning in this context. “No one is in charge” or “Jesus is in charge” is a very real state of being when anyone who has the maturity, gift, opportunity, and God’s timing to do something within the proper context of the few layers of hierarchy that God has put in place like the family structure is able to do it. Here is an example. Last week a woman wanted me and others to pray for her. I was told by my wife to meet her and the woman in the back room. Out of respect I went to the woman’s husband and told him about it then we went and prayed. Did I have the maturity to pray? Opportunity? Gifting? Was it God’s timing for us to pray for her? Did I respect the limited hierarchy of nuclear family that God put in place for our benefit? Now was I in charge of that prayer? Up to the last question most of us would have answered yes. But clearly the only thing I was in charge of was obeying God.

What about you?

Peace, Love, Patience,

-John

Labels: